MARC Record
Leader
852
4
b| GOSA
c| GOSA
j| GOSA
001
9985235770101488
005
20180831091146.0
008
120529s2012 be | 000 0 eng c
035
a| (BeLVLBS)008523577LBS01-Aleph
035
a| (EXLNZ-32KUL_LIBIS_NETWORK)9985235770101471
040
a| BeLVLBS
b| Language of cataloging varies
e| rda based
245
0
0
a| Augustine's appeal to Cyprian in the Donastist and Pelagian controversies
b| a study of the legitimacy of the use of authority in two controversies in Roman North African.
260
a| Leuven
b| KU Leuven. Faculteit Theologie en Religiewetenschappen,
c| 2012.
300
a| XX, 309 p.
336
a| text
2| rdacontent
337
a| unmediated
2| rdamedia
338
a| volume
2| rdacarrier
520
3
a| Central in this research proposal is the reception of Cyprian in Augustine and the Donatists in the Donatist Controversy and in Augustine and in a lesser degree by the Pelagians in the Pelagian Controversy. All parties in both controversies refer positively to Cyprian and consider him as a iudex, vested with auctoritas to be consulted in exemplary and doctrinal matters. The basic question of this research is: if/where/how is the Cyprian profile respectively in both camps different and/or similar and if/where/how Augustine's Cyprianic profile is identical or different in both controversies? Which elements play a role in these similarities in/or differences and can we observe an evolution in Augustine? What does a comparative analysis teach us about the concepts of auctoritas, novitas and traditio in Augustine and his opponents.
502
a| Diss. doct
653
6
a| Theses
650
7
2| UDC
a| 276 =71 AUGUSTINUS
x| Latijnse patrologie--AUGUSTINUS
700
1
a| Gaumer, Matthew Alan
4| aut
700
1
a| Lamberigts, Mathijs.
4| ths
710
2
a| KU Leuven. Faculteit Theologie en Religiewetenschappen.
4| dgg
856
4
0
u| https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/346921
y| Only internally accessible from the KU Leuven intranet
856
4
u| http://limo.libis.be/KULeuven:PHYS_ITEMS:32LIBIS_ALMA_DS71167685390001471
x| Limo permalink